How to Get the Interview
Before It's Posted
The roles that change careers rarely show up on Seek. The people who land them reached out before the job existed. Here is exactly how.
Job boards are not the primary hiring mechanism for the roles most people actually want. They are a fallback.
When a firm needs to hire someone for a meaningful role, the first thing most hiring managers do is think about who they know, who has been referred to them, or who has already been in contact and made an impression. If that search produces nothing, they put it on LinkedIn. If LinkedIn does not work, they list it on Seek. By the time the job is on Seek, you are competing with everyone else who does not have a direct connection to the role.
This is not a cynical observation about the system. It is just how hiring actually works. People hire people they have some connection to or context on because it reduces uncertainty. A referred candidate carries an implicit endorsement. A candidate who reached out proactively three months ago and followed up professionally has already demonstrated initiative, interest and communication skills before the first interview question is asked.
The shift in mindset this requires: stop thinking about "finding jobs" and start thinking about "building the relationships that make jobs findable." One is reactive. The other is how the careers that seem to happen easily are actually built.
Every person you reach out to will look you up before they reply. That is not a maybe. It is a certainty. Your LinkedIn profile is read before anyone decides whether your message is worth responding to. If it looks like a template, they will treat you like one.
Profile photo
This matters more than people admit. You do not need a professional photographer. You need a clear, well-lit photo where your face is visible and you look like someone a professional would be comfortable introducing to a colleague. Good lighting, a plain background, and a slight smile is enough. No group photos cropped down, no sunglasses, no holiday shots. If you would not use it as your profile picture for a university portal, do not use it here.
Headline
Your default LinkedIn headline is your degree and university. That tells people nothing beyond what is already obvious from your education section. Use the headline to say what you are interested in and where you are heading.
Instead of "Commerce Student at UNSW," try: "Finance student at UNSW | Interested in investment banking and capital markets" or "Law student at Melbourne | Focused on corporate and M&A law."
That small change tells someone scanning your profile something real about you. It also means you are more likely to show up in searches when people are looking for students in your area of interest.
About section
Three to four sentences. That is all you need. Say what you are studying, what genuinely interests you about that field, and what you are looking for. Write it the way you would introduce yourself to someone at an industry event. Not formal. Not robotic. Not "passionate and driven."
Compare these two:
What not to write
I am a highly motivated and passionate finance student seeking to leverage my academic knowledge and interpersonal skills in a dynamic and fast-paced professional environment. I am driven by a desire to make an impact and am eager to contribute to a team-oriented culture.
What actually works
I am a third-year commerce student at UNSW, majoring in finance with a focus on equity markets. I have spent the last year building skills in financial modelling and following the infrastructure deal cycle in ANZ closely. I am looking to break into investment banking or capital markets, and I am genuinely interested in the work being done in the space right now. Happy to connect with anyone working in this area.
Experience and projects
Add everything relevant: university clubs, part-time jobs, internships, academic projects, case competitions. For each one, write one or two bullet points that describe what you actually did, not a job description. "Conducted financial analysis for a client pitch as part of a semester-long consulting project" is useful. "Responsible for various tasks in a team environment" is not.
How to stay visible without posting constantly
You do not need to create original content to be visible on LinkedIn. Commenting thoughtfully on posts by people in your target industry is enough. Not "great post!" but an actual observation or a question that shows you engaged with what they said. Do this a few times a week and you will start appearing in the feeds of people in your target industry. When you eventually reach out to one of them directly, your name will not be completely unfamiliar.
Connection requests vs. cold messages
Always send a personalised note with a connection request. The default "I'd like to add you to my professional network" is ignored almost universally. A short note explaining who you are and why you want to connect takes 30 seconds and significantly increases acceptance rates.
Cold emails fail almost exclusively for one reason: they are about the sender, not the recipient. They lead with what the sender wants, ask for things without giving anything, and make the reader do work to understand why they should care. The cold email that gets a reply is short, specific, shows the sender has done their research, and asks for something small and reasonable.
Find the right person to email
Before you write a word, you need to know who you are writing to. Emailing a general inbox or the HR department is rarely useful for this kind of outreach. You want a specific person, ideally someone one or two levels above the role you eventually want, who has enough seniority to be interesting but enough proximity to know what early-career hiring looks like.
The subject line
Keep it short. Make it clear. Never use "Following up on my application" or "Seeking opportunities" or "Quick question." Those are deleted on instinct.
The structure of the email itself
Real example, use this as your starting point
Hi [Name],
I am a final-year Commerce student at [Uni] with a strong interest in [their field]. I came across your work on [specific project, article, or thing you found] and it is exactly the area I want to build experience in.
Would you be open to a 20 minute chat about your career path and what the team is working on?
Thanks for reading this. I know your time is limited and genuinely appreciate it.
[Your name]
The goal of this email is not to land a job. It is to get a conversation. One message will not get you hired. But one conversation, handled well, can lead to a referral, which can lead to an interview that never got posted. Think in steps.
Following up
If you send the email and hear nothing after seven business days, one follow-up is appropriate. Keep it to two sentences. Something like: "Hi [Name], just following up on my note from last week in case it got buried. Happy if the timing is not right. Thanks again." That is the full follow-up. If there is still no response, move on. Two unanswered messages is the limit. Sending a third crosses from persistence into annoyance, and annoyance is memorable for the wrong reasons.
An informational interview is a 20 minute conversation with someone working in the role or company you want to be in. It is not a job interview. It is not a pitch. It is a conversation where you ask questions and listen. That distinction matters more than almost anything else in this guide.
Why they work
People like talking about themselves and their career. Most professionals, when asked genuinely and respectfully, are happy to spend 20 minutes sharing how they got where they are. You are not asking for a favour when you request an informational interview. You are offering someone a chance to share their experience with a person who will genuinely value it. Most say yes when asked well.
The second reason they work: a person who has had a real conversation with you is far more likely to think of you when a role opens than a name on a CV they have never spoken to. The informational interview is the mechanism that converts a cold contact into a warm advocate.
How to ask for one
Be direct and make it low-pressure. The ask should be small, specific and easy to say yes to. The biggest mistake people make is being vague ("I would love to connect sometime") or making it feel like more than it is.
How to ask, this works
Hi [Name],
I am not expecting anything to come from this. I just want to learn from someone who has built a career in [their area]. Would you have 20 minutes for a call in the next few weeks?
[Your name]
That framing removes all pressure. You are not asking them to hire you, refer you or do anything beyond having a short conversation. Almost everyone can say yes to that.
What to ask when you get there
Prepare five or six questions before the call. Make them open and specific to their experience. The best informational interview questions are ones only they can answer.
What not to do
What to do after
Send a follow-up message within 24 hours. Make it specific. Reference one thing they said that was genuinely useful or made you think differently. Not "thanks so much, that was really helpful." Something like: "Your point about [specific thing] changed how I am thinking about [specific decision]. I really appreciate you taking the time."
That specific follow-up is how a one-off 20 minute conversation becomes a lasting professional relationship. People remember who paid attention. Most people do not send any follow-up at all. The ones who do, and do it with genuine specificity, are the ones who get thought of when something opens up.
A warm introduction, where someone who knows the person you want to meet vouches for you and makes the connection, converts at dramatically higher rates than any cold outreach. The person receiving the introduction already has a reason to trust you before the first word is exchanged. That is an enormous advantage, and most students underestimate how accessible it is.
Who is already in your network
Most students think in terms of direct connections, people they know well enough to call, and miss the far more valuable second-degree connections sitting just one step away. Before you reach outward, map what you already have access to.
How to ask for an introduction without making it awkward
When you ask someone to introduce you to a person in their network, you are asking them to put their name and reputation behind the connection. Make it as easy as possible for them to say yes. The format that works: contact your mutual connection directly, explain what you are looking for and why, name the specific person you want to meet, and offer to write the introduction they can simply forward.
"I noticed you are connected to [Name] at [Company]. I am genuinely interested in [their field] and would love to reach out to them. Would you be comfortable making an introduction, or happy if I mentioned your name when I got in touch?"
That script works because it gives the person making the intro two options: a formal introduction or simply permission to drop their name. The second option has almost no friction. Most people are happy to do the favour when you have made the work of doing it this easy.
Write the email they can forward
If they agree to make a formal introduction, do not make them write it. Send them a short paragraph they can paste directly into an email and forward on. Something like:
The forwardable intro, send this to your contact
Hi [Name],
I wanted to introduce you to [Your Name], a final-year [degree] student at [Uni] who I have known for [context]. They are seriously interested in [their field] and are exactly the kind of person worth having a conversation with. I thought of you given your work at [Company].
[Your Name], I will let you take it from here.
When you make it that easy, people follow through. When you leave it to them to figure out what to say, it gets forgotten.
Make introductions go both ways
The fastest way to build a reputation as someone worth knowing is to introduce people to each other without expecting anything in return. When you think someone you know would genuinely benefit from knowing someone else you know, make that connection. People who do this consistently are remembered, trusted and included in opportunities that never go public.
Sending five emails to five random people you found on LinkedIn is not a strategy. It is activity that feels productive but produces nothing. The people who consistently land roles through proactive outreach treat it like a process, not a one-off effort. They have a list, they work it regularly, and they track what happens.
Start with 10 to 20 companies you actually want to work for
Be specific and be honest. Not "somewhere in finance" or "a good law firm." Name the actual organisations. Research them. Understand what makes each one different from its competitors. Know something real about their work before you reach out to anyone there. Vague interest produces vague outreach, and vague outreach gets ignored.
For each company on your list, identify two or three people in roles similar to what you want, or who are one or two levels above it and involved in hiring. Use LinkedIn's People search filtered by company and job title. You are looking for analysts, associates, junior managers, or people with "talent" or "people" in their title if you want to understand the hiring process.
Set a weekly outreach goal and stick to it
Reach out to three people per week. That is 12 per month. Even at a 10 percent response rate, that is one or two real conversations every few weeks. Done consistently over a semester, that is 20 to 30 conversations with people in industries you want to enter, before a single application is submitted.
Three per week sounds small. Most students do three total and then stop when they do not hear back immediately. The consistent ones, the ones who keep going week after week without expecting instant results, are the ones who end up with advocates at the firms they are applying to when application season opens.
Track your outreach
A simple spreadsheet is all you need. Build a table with these columns and update it every time you take an action:
This takes ten minutes a week to maintain and eliminates the cognitive load of remembering who you contacted and when. It also shows you patterns: which types of outreach are getting responses, which companies seem more accessible, and how much of the work you are actually doing versus intending to do.
Companies do not decide to hire someone and post the role the same day. There is almost always a window, sometimes days, sometimes weeks, between when the need becomes clear and when the job advertisement goes live. The person who reaches out during that window gets the conversation before the competition exists. Being first is not about being pushy. It is about being ready.
How to know when a company might be hiring
What to say when you reach out at the right moment
You do not need to mention that you saw a hiring signal. You just need to reach out at that moment with a genuine, specific message asking for a conversation. The timing does the work. If the company is actively thinking about hiring and your message lands in front of the right person that week, the probability of a reply goes up significantly compared to reaching out when there is no immediate need.
Being first is not about being aggressive or claiming insider knowledge. It is about paying attention and being ready to act when the signals are right. Most candidates wait for the role to be public. You are reaching out while the conversation about hiring is still internal.
Most people either do not follow up at all, which is a wasted opportunity, or they follow up in a way that feels desperate or persistent. Neither works. There is a straightforward way to stay on someone's radar that is professional, low-pressure and genuinely valued by the people you are staying in touch with.
The one-week rule for initial outreach
If you send a cold email or LinkedIn message and get no response after seven business days, one follow-up is appropriate. Keep it to two sentences. Something like: "Hi [Name], just following up in case this got lost. Happy if the timing is not right, I just wanted to make sure you saw it." That is it. If there is still no response after that, move on. Two unanswered messages is the limit. Sending a third is the point at which you cross from persistence into annoyance, and annoyance is memorable for the wrong reasons.
Staying in touch with warm contacts
The goal is not to check in every few weeks asking if there are any openings. That is exhausting for the person receiving it and makes the relationship feel transactional. The most effective way to stay in touch is to reach out when you have something genuinely worth sharing, not when you want something.
The goal of follow-up is not to extract value. It is to maintain a relationship so that when the right opportunity exists, your name comes to mind. That only works if the relationship feels genuine rather than transactional. The line between the two is whether you ever give without an agenda.
The most valuable piece of advice in this entire guide is this: start a full year before you think you need to.
The students who walk into final-year internship and graduate applications with meaningful connections at the firms they want to join are not lucky. They started attending industry events in second year. They reached out to alumni before they needed a reference. They had informational interviews with analysts when they were not yet competing for the same roles. By the time applications opened, they already had advocates inside the firms they were applying to.
What the long game actually looks like
The best time to start building your professional network was 12 months ago. The second best time is now. If you are reading this and none of this work has started yet, the answer is not to feel behind. It is to start today and be consistent about it from here.
Want more of this?
Join the community. Get every playbook, every event, every insight.